![math mode - What is the correct way to typeset higher order time derivatives in LaTeX? - TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange math mode - What is the correct way to typeset higher order time derivatives in LaTeX? - TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange](https://i.stack.imgur.com/uW698.png)
math mode - What is the correct way to typeset higher order time derivatives in LaTeX? - TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange
![Miles Cranmer on Twitter: "I regret not reading through the full LaTeX physics package earlier; so many more features than I realized. Many commands that I usually define by hand... e.g., some Miles Cranmer on Twitter: "I regret not reading through the full LaTeX physics package earlier; so many more features than I realized. Many commands that I usually define by hand... e.g., some](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EkpAktvXIAAgZkf.jpg:large)
Miles Cranmer on Twitter: "I regret not reading through the full LaTeX physics package earlier; so many more features than I realized. Many commands that I usually define by hand... e.g., some
![math mode - "Evaluated at" bar for derivatives: \Bigr, \biggr, or \left...\right? - TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange math mode - "Evaluated at" bar for derivatives: \Bigr, \biggr, or \left...\right? - TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange](https://i.stack.imgur.com/7LIJ0.png)
math mode - "Evaluated at" bar for derivatives: \Bigr, \biggr, or \left...\right? - TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange
![How to create such a “stand-out” text box for general text? Package? Manually? [With similar styling options & w/o “Theorem x.x”] : r/LaTeX How to create such a “stand-out” text box for general text? Package? Manually? [With similar styling options & w/o “Theorem x.x”] : r/LaTeX](https://preview.redd.it/jdcjmdopxwi91.png?auto=webp&s=30ca4f0ed2fcbb02943b18d8604f7d0cbc1548ff)